|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李元松,李洋,段鑫,等.埋置式钢波纹管设计方法的比较及分析[J].武汉工程大学学报,2014,(05):15-19.[doi:103969/jissn16742869201405004]
　LI Yuan song,LI Yang,DUAN Xin,et al.Comparison of design method for embedded steel corrugated pipe[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology,2014,(05):15-19.[doi:103969/jissn16742869201405004]
点击复制

埋置式钢波纹管设计方法的比较及分析(/HTML)
分享到：

《武汉工程大学学报》[ISSN:1674-2869/CN:42-1779/TQ]

卷:
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
15-19
栏目:
资源与土木工程
出版日期:
2014-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of design method for embedded steel corrugated pipe
文章编号:
16742869(2014)05001505
作者:
李元松1; 李洋1; 段鑫1; 余顺新2; 卢傲2
1.武汉工程大学资源与土木工程学院，湖北 武汉 430074;2.中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司，湖北 武汉 430056
Author(s):
LI Yuansong1; LI Yang1; DUAN Xin1; YU Shunxin2; LU Ao2
1.School of Resource and Civil Engineering,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;2.China Communication Construction Company Second Highway Consultants Co.Ltd.,Wuhan 430056,China
关键词:
埋置式; 钢波纹管; 涵洞; 设计方法; 对比
Keywords:
embedded; steel corrugated pipe; culvert; design method; comparison
分类号:
U449.1
DOI:
103969/jissn16742869201405004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
埋置式钢波纹管因其具有施工方便、环保等优点，在国外被广泛地应用于水利治理、隧道、小跨径桥涵等工程中，但在国内无成熟经验与相应的设计规范，分析研究美国和加拿大规范对我国相应工程的设计与规范的制订具有重要意义.首先介绍了美加规范关于埋置式钢波纹管的设计原理、计算方法以及参数取值.在此基础之上，运用控制变量法对钢波纹管最小覆土厚度和管壁强度验算进行实例对比.算例表明：最小覆土厚度计算时，加拿大规范除考虑管-土相互作用和土拱效应之外，还考虑了波纹管的管形效应，计算值平均比美国规范计算值大34.05%；管壁验算时美国规范没有考虑土拱效应和波纹管两侧填土重量，管壁抗力比加拿大规范计算值平均大50%以上；美国规范中关于施工验算的要求是加拿大规范的有益补充.
Abstract:
Embedded steel corrugated pipe has been widely used overseas in water treatment，tunnels，bridges culverts and other projects for its advantages of convenient installation and environmental protection.However，there is no mature experience and relative deign specification in our country，which shows the great significance to analyze the American and the Canadian specification.First of all，the design principles，calculation methods and parameter selection for embedded steel corrugated pipe were introduced and then control variable method was used to compare result of the minimum thickness of overlying soil and wall strength calculation.Results shows that the minimum thickness of overlying soil calculated by Canadian method is 34.05% larger than that calculated by the American method in average，because the shape effect of the pipe has also been considered in Canadian method besides pipesoil interaction and soil arch effect which are considered in American method as well.Wall resistance calculated by American method is 50% more than the Canadian results in average in that soil arch effect and the filling weight on both sides of the pipe are ignored in American method.Requirement about construction checking in American method is a good supplement for Canadian method.

参考文献/References:

［1］李元松，夏进，余顺新，等.中欧规范关于桩基承载力确定方法的比较［J］.武汉工程大学学报，2012，34(2)：4449.LI Yuansong,XIA Jin,YU Shunxin,et al.Comparing methods of determining foundation pile bearing capacity in EN19971 with those in Chinese Geotechnical Design Code［J］.Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology,2012，34(2)：4449.(in Chinese)［2］方亚非，温学钧.埋置式波纹钢板管结构的计算方法比较［J］.城市道桥与防洪,2007，5：126129.FANG Yafei,WEN Xuejun.Comparison of calculation methods for embedded corrugated sheet pipe structure［J］.Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control，2007，5：126129.［3］AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications［S］.Washington,DC：American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,2007.［4］CAN/CSAS0606，Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code［S］.Ottawa Canada：The Standards Counail of Comada,2010.［5］JT/T7912010公路桥涵通用波纹钢（板）\[S\].北京：人民交通出版社，2010.［6］中交公路规划设计院.JTGD602004公路桥涵设计通用规范\[S\].北京：人民交通出版社，2004.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：20140224作者简介：李元松（1964），男，湖北应城人，教授，博士.研究方向：岩土工程.
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-06-15