|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]舒荆阳,林之豪.巴拉萨\|萨缪尔森效应下购买力平价模型在中美汇率应用中的评估[J].武汉工程大学学报,2013,(11):69-76.[doi:103969/jissn16742869201311015]
 SHU Jing\|yang,LIN Zhi\|hao,et al.Assessment of adjusted purchasing power parity model from Balassa\|Samuelson effects for China Yuan/U.S. Dollar[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology,2013,(11):69-76.[doi:103969/jissn16742869201311015]
点击复制

巴拉萨\|萨缪尔森效应下购买力平价模型在中美汇率应用中的评估(/HTML)
分享到:

《武汉工程大学学报》[ISSN:1674-2869/CN:42-1779/TQ]

卷:
期数:
2013年11
页码:
69-76
栏目:
其他
出版日期:
2013-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment of adjusted purchasing power parity model from Balassa\|Samuelson effects for China Yuan/U.S. Dollar
文章编号:
16742869(2013)11006908
作者:
舒荆阳12林之豪1 3
1. 美国加州大学戴维斯分校,加利福利亚州 戴维斯市95618;2. 中国人民大学信息学院,北京 100872;3. 中国人民大学财政金融学院,北京100872
Author(s):
SHU Jing\|yang1 2 LIN Zhi\|hao1 3
1. University of California, Davis, CA, Davis 95616 ,U.S.A.; 2.School of Information,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China; 3.School of Finance,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
关键词:
实际均衡汇率模型人民币汇率修正购买力平价模型
Keywords:
real equilibrium exchange rate modelexchange rate of renminbirevised purchasing power parity method
分类号:
F823/82
DOI:
103969/jissn16742869201311015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了评估巴拉萨\|萨缪尔森效应下的购买力平价模型,选择人民币和美元作为目标货币.首先在该效应的基本假设下对模型进行了推导,得出了以劳动生产力和贸易品消费权重等经济变量表示的表达式.在获取相关数据后,以2005年作为基年,对人民币实际均衡汇率进行了估算,通过对实际均衡汇率的估算值与真实值的比较,对模型的适用性做出了初步判断.而后,利用简单线性回归的手段对结果进行了更深入的检验和分析,得出了该模型在此特殊情形下不适用的结论.最后进一步指出了模型内生假设、中美居民消费习惯以及政府干涉等可能导致模型不适用的因素.
Abstract:
To examine the adjusted purchasing power parity model for Balassa\|Samuelson effects, we choose China Yuan and U.S. Dollar as target currencies. Based on five assumptions in Balassa\|Samuelson effect, we firstly derive a simplified formula for real exchange rate expressed by economics variables such as labor productivity and the expenditure share of non\|traded goods. Choosing 2005 as a base year, we estimate the real exchange rate of China Yuan and reach a preliminary diagnostic by comparing estimated values with real equilibrium exchange rates. Simple linear regression method is adopted, and we conclude that this model does not hold in this specific case. In the final part, we point out four drawbacks of this model, which are innate flaws in its assumptions, disagreements in consumption patterns between Chinese and the U.S. citizens, and government interventions, etc.

参考文献/References:

[1]ISARD P.Equilibrium exchange rates: assessment methodologies,IMF working paper,WP/07/296\[R\]. Washington,DC USA:International Monetary Fund ,2007.[2]BALASSA B. The purchasing\|power parity doctrine: A reappraisal\[J\]. Journal of Political Economy, 1964,72(6):584\|596.[3]COUDERT V, COUHARDE C. Real equilibrium exchange rate in China,CEPII working paper,2005\|1\[R\].Paris: Centre d’tude Prospectives et d’Informations Internationale,2005.[4]SATO K, SHIMIZU J, SHRESTHA N, et al. New estimates of the equilibrium exchange rate: the case for the Chinese renminbi\[J\].The World Economy,2012,35 (4): 419\|443.[5]CHEUNG Yin\|Wong,CHINN M D,FUJII E.The overvaluation of Renminbi undervaluation\[J\].Journal of International Money and Finance, 2007(26):762\|785.[6]FARIA J R,LEN\|LEDESMA M. Testing the Balassa\|Samuelson effect: Implications for growth and the PPP\[J\]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2003 25(2): 241\|253.[7]FISHER E, PARK J Y. Testing purchasing power parity under the null hypothesis of co\|integration\[J\].The Economic Journal, 1991,101 (409): 1476\|1484.[8]DORNBUSCH R. Exchange rates and prices\[J\].The American Economic Review,1987,77(1):93\|106.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:20131031作者简介:舒荆阳(1992\|),男,浙江宁波人.研究方向:应用数学与金融工程
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-12-03