|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]史丽玲.小说《宠儿》中的话语对抗与主体动态重建[J].武汉工程大学学报,2010,(08):64-69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.16742869.2010.08.017]
　SHI Liling.The confrontation of discourses and the dynamic construction of subjectivity in Beloved [J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology,2010,(08):64-69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.16742869.2010.08.017]
点击复制

小说《宠儿》中的话语对抗与主体动态重建(/HTML)
分享到：

《武汉工程大学学报》[ISSN:1674-2869/CN:42-1779/TQ]

卷:
期数:
2010年08期
页码:
64-69
栏目:
其他
出版日期:
2010-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
The confrontation of discourses and
the dynamic construction of subjectivity in Beloved
文章编号:
16742869(2010)08006406
作者:
史丽玲
云南师范大学外国语学院，云南 昆明 650092
Author(s):
SHI Liling
School of Foreign Languages,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650092,China
关键词:
《宠儿》; 书写性文本; 口语性文本; 召唤—回应; 主体性
Keywords:
Beloved;  written text;  oral text;  callandresponse;  subjecivity
分类号:
H315
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.16742869.2010.08.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
主体性是黑人文学探讨的一个重要主题，莫里森的小说《宠儿》深刻揭示了话语与主体性的辩证关系。在经济和政治领域处于对抗的奴隶主与奴隶两大阶级，分别采取不同的话语形式，以期建立不同的话语秩序。奴隶主叙述以书写性文本为表述模式，巩固其权力并消解奴隶主体性。另一方面，奴隶们选择植根于黑人口头传统的口语性文本，与书写性文本形成对抗。莫里森将源于黑人口传文化的召唤—回应模式融入了小说创作，不仅使奴隶叙述成为一个具有开放性、平等性、参与性、即兴性等特点的口语性文本，而且促成了奴隶叙述文本之间、奴隶个体之间的动态多重互动，奴隶最终得以重建主体性。
Abstract:
Subjectivity is one of the major topics in AfroAmerican literature.The novel Beloved profoundly reveals the dialetical relations between discouse and subjectivity.Being confronted economically and peotically,the masters and the slaves take different forms of discourses in order to establish different oders of discourse.The master narrative takes written text as its narrative form not only to consolidate its power and ideology but to deconstruct the slaves subjectivity.On the other hand,slaves employ the oral text grounded in AfroAmerican oral culture and enter into the confrontation with masters written text.Morrison adaptes callandresponse to her fiction so as not only to creat an open,equal,participatory and improvisatory oral text but promote multidimentional dynamic reactions among slave narrations and among individual slaves.In the process of reactions,the slaves finally reconstruct their subjectivities.

参考文献/References:

［1］孙辉.从语言到话语——当代文学理论批评两度转向之学理逻辑探析［J］.暨南学报：哲学社会科学,2002(5):5992.
［2］黄念然.话语批评学：关于一种文艺批评新模式的思考［J］.湖北大学学报：哲学社会科学，2004（5）：332335.
［3］马大康.重返大地的努力——诗性语言研究［J］.温州师范学院学报：哲学社会科学，2005（4）：18.
［4］托尼·莫里森.宠儿［M］.潘岳,雷格，译.海口:南海出版社,2006：78.
［5］谷小娟,李艺.语言与身份建构：相关文献回顾［J］.外语学刊，2007（6）：101108.
［6］Callahan J F.In the AfricanAmerican grain: The pursuit of voice in twentiethcentury black fiction［M］.Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press,1988:1416.
［7］Morrison T.Memory,creation and writing［J］.Thought,1984（59）:389.
［8］Atkinson Y.Language that bears witness: the black english oral tradition in the works of Toni Morrison.［M］//Marc C Conner.The Aesthetics of Toni Morrison: Speaking the Unspeakable, University Press of Mississippi,2000:1230.
［9］Wolfe J.Ten minutes for seven letters: song as key to narrative revision in Toni Morrison’s Beloved［J］.Narrative， 2004(18):263.
［10］海德格尔.在通向语言的途中［M］.北京:商务印书馆，1999：63.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
吴晏佩收稿日期：20100405作者简介：史丽玲（1979），女，云南普洱人，讲师，硕士。研究方向：美国文学、文学理论研究。
更新日期/Last Update: